Yes, it makes sense that the PSI would drop as RPMs rise. Unless the compressor is increasing speed as well, but then having as much boost as you can at any point is better than reducing it in the middle just to make the top look better.Put Bluey on the dyno today . Was hoping to break 300whp but didn't quite get there.
peak power of 282whp with impressive (for a rotary) midrange torque of 204lb/ft. Note to boost decline 6.5 down to 4psi at peak which was a little disappointing. Black trace on dyno was same car N/A so an increase of 73whp with only 4psi! Battery was outputting 360A @ 44v at peak power.
I've often looked at this trend and imagined being able to achieve a max boost level that was too high from launch, to just over midrange rpm so that the excess could then be parsed in to sustain a long flat power peak as the excess boost became appropriate/safe to apply with the increasing and less efficient rpm region where boost would normally start to drop off, in an effort to give acceleration an infinite feeling of power.Yes, it makes sense that the PSI would drop as RPMs rise. Unless the compressor is increasing speed as well, but then having as much boost as you can at any point is better than reducing it in the middle just to make the top look better.
Nice to see it moving forward
Hamilton NZ which is at 40m above sea level.I just read through this whole thread and really like what I am seeing/reading. Thank you for sharing and thanks to all that replied.
I do have a question for Brettus8, what elevation are you at when doing this testing? I guess most specifically where you had the car on the dyno.